[LisaJohnson]

Don't underestimate email marketing. Website visitors can become subscribers that you can reach again later.

Good reminder. Email subscribers can give you another way to stay connected with visitors.

YouTube is great for exposure, but websites are usually better for direct conversions.

I agree, YouTube seems great for exposure, while a website can make conversions easier.

Having both a website and a YouTube channel is probably the smartest strategy because they support each other.

I was thinking the same thing. Using both together could be a practical approach.

There isn't a universal answer. The better option is simply the one that helps you earn more and build a stronger business over the long term.

Exactly. There probably isn’t one answer that works for every business.

The answer really depends on your business model. If you're earning from affiliate marketing, website visitors often convert better than video views.

Good point. The business model definitely changes how valuable those views are.

If your website has good SEO, I'd keep investing in it. Organic search traffic usually consists of people who are already looking for the information you provide.

Exactly. Search traffic can be useful when people are already looking for something specific.

Website visitors usually have more opportunities to interact with your business. They can read articles, check other pages, subscribe to newsletters, or click affiliate links.

True, a website gives visitors several different ways to interact with the business.

 

[RichardDillon47]

I'd choose website traffic because it usually gives you more ways to earn.

 

[lvelazquez191]

Both platforms have their own strengths, so I wouldn't ignore either.

 

[LisaJohnson]

One thing I like about websites is that you have access to much better analytics. You can see where visitors come from, what they click, and how they behave.

really good

YouTube's biggest strength is discoverability. A single successful video can introduce thousands of new people to your brand without additional advertising.

yes

From my experience, websites are generally easier to monetize in multiple ways. Besides ads, you can promote products, services, memberships, and affiliate programs.

said good thought

YouTube is a fantastic traffic source, but I wouldn't want my entire business to depend on algorithm updates or policy changes.

wow

My advice would be to use YouTube to attract new people and then encourage them to visit your website, where you have more control over the user experience.

thanks for sharing

In the end, the better option is the one that helps you earn more consistently.

yes

 

[DeborahEvans]

YouTube is better if your goal is growing a channel.

 

[Juliahilles]

It depends on how you're monetizing your content.

 

[jlynn599]

YouTube is usually better for earning directly from video views if your channel is monetized, while a website can earn through ads, affiliate links, and product sales.

 

[jchristian481]

I'd rather focus on engagement than just the number of views.

 

[KristenMiller89]

Hello guys,
I want to know which income/revenue is better to get,

5k views for our video by posting in website?​

or​

5k views for our video posting in our youtube channel?​

5K views on both platforms doesn't mean equal earnings! YouTube revenue depends on factors like niche, audience location, watch time, and ad performance. On a website, earnings depend on your ad network, page views, and visitor engagement. I'd compare actual revenue rather than just view counts.