I've learned that communication with clients is just as important as campaign management. Setting realistic expectations from the beginning avoids a lot of unnecessary frustration later.
Both platforms can deliver excellent results when used correctly. I usually recommend choosing the platform that best matches where your customers are in the buying journey instead of assuming one is automatically better.
The biggest improvement I've seen recently has come from regularly testing different ad copy. Sometimes a small wording change improves click-through rate far more than expected.
I mostly manage campaigns for small businesses, and keeping things simple often works best. Well-structured campaigns with clear goals usually outperform complicated account setups.
One lesson I learned early was not to rely entirely on automated recommendations. Some suggestions are useful, but others don't necessarily fit the specific goals of the account you're managing.
I've been running paid campaigns for quite a while now, and I still learn something new every month. Google Ads and Facebook Ads both change regularly, so staying updated and continuously testing new ideas has been one of the biggest reasons my campaigns continue to improve over time.
I've always believed that neither platform is better than the other—they simply serve different purposes. Google helps you reach people who are already searching, while Facebook helps you reach people who didn't know they needed your product yet.
I've been running paid ads for about three years now, and one thing I've learned is that testing never really ends. Every campaign teaches you something new, even when the results aren't great.
If someone asked me to choose only one platform, I'd probably pick Google Ads. The buying intent is usually much stronger, especially for service-based businesses.
Facebook Ads can be incredibly powerful, but they also require strong creatives. Even a perfectly targeted audience won't respond if the ad itself doesn't grab attention.
One thing that surprised me was how much landing pages affect campaign performance. I spent weeks adjusting ads before realising the website was the real problem.
I actually enjoy working with Facebook campaigns because they allow a lot more creativity. Testing videos, carousels, and different messaging keeps things interesting.
Automation has improved a lot over the last few years, but I still like checking campaigns manually. Sometimes small adjustments make a noticeable difference.
One of my earliest mistakes was increasing the daily budget every time I saw good results. I quickly realised that scaling too fast can sometimes hurt performance instead of improving it.
I've noticed that many beginners spend too much time worrying about clicks instead of focusing on actual conversions. At the end of the day, sales matter far more than traffic.
Google Ads has become one of my favourite marketing channels because the data is incredibly useful. Even unsuccessful campaigns provide valuable insights for future optimisation.
One campaign that still stands out to me was for a small retailer. We started with a modest budget, kept refining the audience and messaging, and eventually achieved results that exceeded everyone's expectations.
Sometimes the simplest campaigns perform the best. I've seen highly complicated account structures lose to straightforward campaigns with clear objectives and relevant keywords.